Understanding Typescript Interface vs Type

For neophytes and seasoned developers, understanding the differences between ‘type’ and ‘interface’ in Typescript can be a stumbling block. Despite having quite similar applications, these constructs have unique features and application fields.

So, let’s delve into the world of Typescript and unravel the crucial differences between ‘type’ and ‘interface.’

Defining the Concept of ‘Type’ in TypeScript

TypeScript ‘Type’ is a powerful feature that helps us define and enforce the form of values within our code. They characterize the expected structure or nature of variables, parameters, return values, or object properties. By specifying types, you set your intentions clear and aid the compiler in finding potential issues.

Notably, TypeScript supports multiple types, including number, string, array, boolean, void, null, undefined, any (which can be of any type), and user-defined types (which can use interfaces, classes, etc.). Furthermore, ‘Type’ in TypeScript supports creating composite types using Union, Intersection, Function type, and more.

Example of TypeScript type definition in ReactJS

import React from 'react';

// Define the props type
type GreetingProps = {
  name: string;

// Define the component with type annotations
const Greeting: React.FC<GreetingProps> = ({ name }) => {
  return <div>Hello, {name}!</div>;

// App component
const App: React.FC = () => {
  return <Greeting name="John" />;

export default App;

A Basic Overview of ‘Interface’ in TypeScript

Though TypeScript‘s ‘Interface’ is similar to ‘Type’ in defining properties, it leans more towards object orientation, primarily when creating contractual obligations. In essence, interfaces provide a way to define user-created complex types. They’re a powerful tool to specify contracts within your code and contracts with code outside of your project.

Generally, interfaces set a blueprint for classes, shaping the way objects should interact within your code. An exciting property of TypeScript interfaces is that they disappear when you compile your code into JavaScript – this process is called “structural typing.”

Example of an interface setting the blueprint for a class

// Interface definition
interface Vehicle {
  brand: string;
  model: string;
  year: number;
  startEngine(): void;

// Implement the interface in a class
class Car implements Vehicle {
  brand: string;
  model: string;
  year: number;

  constructor(brand: string, model: string, year: number) {
    this.brand = brand;
    this.model = model;
    this.year = year;

  startEngine() {
    console.log(`${this.brand} ${this.model} engine started.`);

// Create an instance of the class
const myCar = new Car('Toyota', 'Camry', 2022);
myCar.startEngine(); // Output: Toyota Camry engine started.

Investigating the Core Differences between Type and Interface

While both ‘Type’ and ‘Interface’ structures serve a similar purpose (providing static types for variables, functions, and classes), they come with differing functionalities and uses. In short, the ‘Interface’ is the go-to tool for defining shapes of objects, while ‘Type’ serves as a broader toolset for type-checking.

‘Interface’ is extendable and can be implemented in the class for object-oriented programming in TypeScript. On the other hand, ‘Type’ isn’t extendable but can represent primitive types such as Union, Intersection, Tuples, and general types.

The Role and Functionality of ‘Interface’ in TypeScript

‘Interface’ is a structure that defines a contract in your application. It defines the syntax for classes to follow. It dictates a set of properties and methods that a class should include to fulfill a particular contract. Notably, classes that implement an interface must adhere strictly to its structure.

While using interfaces, one can optionally choose to implement the properties and methods in the class. However, it’s a good practice to implement all the properties and methods declared in an interface in the class, thus ensuring that you do not miss any functionality.

Practical Examples: Utilizing Type and Interface in Coding

The choice between ‘Type’ and ‘Interface’ often comes down to specific use cases. For instance, if we need to merge declarations, ‘Interface’ becomes a handy tool. Interfaces are also beneficial when defining constructs like dictionaries.

However, when working with tuples, union, or intersection types, ‘Type’ is more advantageous. ‘Type’ also shines in scenarios where one needs to define optional properties since it allows partial types to be declared.

The Pros and Cons of Using ‘Type’ in TypeScript

Using ‘Type’ confers several benefits. It simplifies the declaration of complex types, making code easier to read and understand. Furthermore, with ‘Type’, we can create union, intersection, indexed, and mapped types. This enhanced flexibility, however, may lead to more complicated and harder-to-understand code.

Despite these advantages, ‘Type’ comes with its set of limitations. It does not support declaration merging and isn’t as great at creating contractual obligations between classes, functions, and variables.

The Advantages and Disadvantages of ‘Interface’ in TypeScript

The ‘Interface’ shines in creating contractual obligations between different parts of your code. It’s powerful when building applications following object-oriented programming principles and supports declaration merging, which is advantageous in extending existing declarations.

However, interfaces find their limitations in defining union or intersection types. They are also incapable of representing primitive types like ‘Type.’

Common Misconceptions about TypeScript’s Type and Interface

The primary misconception regarding TypeScript is that ‘Type’ and ‘Interface’ are interchangeable concepts. While they serve similar functions, their core differences lie in their usage. ‘Type’ is more suitable for defining complex types and representing primitive types, whereas ‘Interface’ is perfect for enforcing rules on classes and objects.

Best Practices When Using Type and Interface

There are certainly best practices when using ‘Type’ and ‘Interface’ in TypeScript. For instance, using specific types instead of the ‘any’ type whenever possible enhances TypeScript’s ability to catch and prevent errors.

As for ‘Interface,’ avoid using optional properties wherever possible since optional properties lead to a lot of undefined checking in the code. Remember, interfaces should represent what your objects will look like, not what they could end up looking like.

Tips and Tricks to Effectively Differentiate ‘Type’ and ‘Interface’

Differentiating between ‘Type’ and ‘Interface’ involves understanding their unique potentials. One little tip is that if you come from an object-oriented programming language or think from an OOP perspective, interfaces will feel more at home. On the contrary, if the defining types involve combining different types or dealing with complex, composite types, ‘Type’ will be your best bet.

Leave a Comment